JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 12, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Norberto Hernandez Jimenez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma auto que rechaza demanda por incumplimiento de requisitos de claridad, certeza, especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia
  • Se confirma rechazo por no cumplir con la carga mínima argumentativa exigida para la acción de constitucionalidad por omisión legislativa relativa
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda fue rechazada porque el actor en el escrito de corrección no logró cumplir con los requerimientos advertidos en el auto de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación estuvo de acuerdo con los argumentos de la magistrada sustanciadora y decidió CONFIRMAR íntegramente la providencia cuestionada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del 10 de julio de 2020, a traves del cual el despacho sustanciador rechazo la demanda correspondiente al expediente D-13750.
  2. Segundo. Proceda la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional a comunicar el contenido de esta decision al recurrente.
  3. Tercero. Archivese el expediente D-13750.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.